• Cultural Enterprise & the Arts
  • Creative Enterprise & Design
  • Cultural Enterprise & the Arts
  • Creative Enterprise & Design
CATALYST | Creative Enterprise Leadership logo
  • JOIN US
    • About Our Network
    • Pratt ACM | DM Programs
    • Community News
    • Stay Connected
  • CATALYST REVIEW
  • CASES
    • Making the Case
    • Case Studies
  • CONVERSATIONS
    • Conversations of Consequence
  • CATALYST JOURNEYS
  • COLLABORATIONS
    • Capstone Projects
  • JOIN US
    • About Our Network
    • Pratt ACM | DM Programs
    • Community News
    • Stay Connected
  • CATALYST REVIEW
  • CASES
    • Making the Case
    • Case Studies
  • CONVERSATIONS
    • Conversations of Consequence
  • CATALYST JOURNEYS
  • COLLABORATIONS
    • Capstone Projects

Innovation Performance in Europe 2010

Tweet

The European Union released the Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010, which is an assessment of innovation performance in EU member states in the last year. The Innovation Scoreboard includes the relative strengths and weaknesses of each EU member’s research and innovation systems. Main categories cover enablers, firm activities, and outputs. “Enablers” describes the basic elements that lead innovations, like HR, Finance and Research systems. “Firm Activities” shows measurements such as firm investments, linkages & entrepreneurship, and intellectual assets. “Outputs” indicate benefits that innovation brings to the economy as a whole, like economic effects.

Figure_1Countries have been placed in 4 levels according to different innovation performances. As the figure 1 shows, Denmark, Finland, Germany, and Sweden all show performance well above that of the EU27 average, indicating that they are innovation leaders. The second group, innovation followers, includes above-average countries such as Austria, Belgium, and France. The third and fourth groups are those countries that are weak in innovation. Greece, Italy, and Portland are all below the average level of innovation performance.

 

Figure_2The 2011 Scoreboard also makes comparisons between EU Member States, other European countries, the US, Japan, and other countries. Figure 2 shows the comparison with key competitors.

TagsFeaturedInnovationInspiring CreativityStrategic Design

Tweet
Previous Story

“American Idol” for Inventors

Next Story

The T-Shirt Crisis

About the author

Yu Zhang

Related Posts

  • CATALYZING the Conversation: Designing Policy for People

    By Dr. Mary McBride
    CATALYZING the Conversation: Designing...
  • A Creativity Imperative for the Future of Capitalism

    By CATALYST
    Proposing policy shifts to strengthen the...
  • The Virtual Spark to Unleashing Creativity

    By CATALYST
    The Virtual Spark to Unleashing...
  • East Meets West: A Guide to More Collaborative Work Environments

    By CATALYST
    East Meets West: A guide to more...

CATALYST SHOP

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

PRATT INTERNATIONAL GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN CREATIVE ENTERPRISE LEADERSHIP

THE GLOBAL GOALS

1. No Poverty
2. Zero Hunger
3. Good Health & Wellbeing
4. Quality Education
5. Gender Equality
6. Clean Water & Sanitation
7. Affordable & Clean Energy
8. Decent Work & Economic Growth
9. Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure
10. Reduced Inequalities
11. Sustainable Cities & Communities
12. Responsible Consumption & Production
13. Climate Action
14. Life Below Water
15. Life on Land
16. Peace, Justice & Strong Institutions
17. Partnerships for the Goals

logo
  • Cultural Enterprise & the Arts
  • Creative Enterprise & Design
Copyright 2021 | Catalyst | Creative Enterprise Leadership