Executive Summary(Re)designing Urban Education
By Paul Tough
Design + the Zone
By Erin Weber
Issue 1 Spring | Summer 2009
The second UN Millennium Goal calls for universal primary education. In general the Goals are directed towards third world and developing countries, yet studies show that by the time poor minority children reach the American kindergarten system, there already exists a dramatic gap in cognitive ability from their white, middle-class peers. One Harlem-based organization is dedicated to reversing the trend of urban poverty through a revolutionary education program. Paul Tough is the author of Whatever it Takes: Geoffrey Canada’s Quest to Change Harlem in America, which chronicles five years in the life of the Harlem Children’s Zone. The following essay by Tough is adapted from “Schoolhouse Rock,” a blog he wrote on Slate.com last fall. The essay is followed by an analysis and recommendations for the use of design management processes and practices to further enhance the successful program.
Whatever it Takes
My interest in education and schools came about in sort of a roundabout way. In 2003, I started reporting on what was then a fairly modest social-service agency in upper Manhattan called the Harlem Children’s Zone. That reporting turned into an article in the New York Times Magazine about the project and its founder, Geoffrey Canada, an ambitious and charismatic man in his early 50s who had come up with a unique approach to combating poverty. He had selected a 24-block neighborhood in central Harlem and was saturating the children who lived there with educational and social supports. His goal was to get them all to college and to transform the neighborhood in a single generation.
Usually when I get to the end of reporting a big magazine article, I’m pretty sick of the subject. But this time, the article felt like the beginning of a story rather than the end of one. I wanted to keep following the experiment that was unfolding in Harlem. And so I decided to write a book about it.
Two months after the Harlem article came out in the New York Times Magazine, Geoffrey Canada opened his first charter school, the Promise Academy. When the middle school opened, the administrators gave every sixth-grade student a diagnostic test. They expected that many of the children would be behind grade level; most kids in public schools in Harlem are. But when they got back the results, they were shocked by just how far behind grade level the kids were. Fifty-seven percent of the sixth-grade class was reading at a third-grade level or below.? And Geoff Canada had just promised to get them all to college. I wanted to find out why those kids had fallen so far behind—and whether anyone had yet figured out a way to do what Canada wanted to do: take disaffected 10-year-olds who had till then received only the most threadbare education and accelerate them to a point where they were on par with their middle-class peers.
What Geoffrey Canada has constructed in Harlem is a comprehensive set of integrated programs that currently serve 8,000 kids in a 97-block neighborhood starting at birth and going all the way through college. It is based on two innovative ideas. The first is what Canada calls the Conveyor Belt—a system that reaches kids early and then moves them through a seamless series of programs that try to re-create the invisible cocoon of support that surrounds middle-class and upper-middle-class kids throughout their childhoods. The Conveyor Belt starts with Baby College, a nine-week program that provides expecting parents and parents of young children with new information about effective parenting strategies. The next stop is an all-day language-focused pre-kindergarten for 200 4-year-olds, who then graduate into a K-12 charter school that has an extended day and an extended year and employs some of the intensive academic practices developed in the KIPP schools. Throughout their academic careers, students at the school have access to social supports: after-school tutoring, a teen arts center, family counseling, and a health clinic.?? The second idea is a tipping-point notion—what Canada refers to as contamination. His theory is that in a low-income, high-crime neighborhood, if you offer social and educational supports to just a few of the kids who live there, their participation will always seem a bit oddball, and they won’t have much of an effect on their peers. But if you get participation rates up to 40 percent or 50 percent or 60 percent, then taking part will come to seem normal, and some of the behaviors that used to seem commonplace in Harlem—teenage pregnancy, drug use, dropping out of school—will start to seem like the oddball path. The engaged kids will “contaminate” their friends with their behaviors and attitudes.
Expecting mothers participating in the Baby College program at Harlem Children’s Zone.
Canada’s system isn’t easy. It requires a lot of hard work just to keep it in motion. And in the years that I spent reporting in Harlem, Canada and his staff made lots of wrong turns and hit plenty of dead ends. In the book, I followed one class of parents through Baby College, and some of them, it seemed, faced such big deficits and such huge obstacles in life—they couldn’t read, they had had other children taken away by Child Services, they had spent a couple of years in jail—that it seemed hard to believe they would ever be truly effective parents. In the middle school, the first couple of years were quite rocky, as Canada struggled to combine the ethos of a community organization with the accountability of a no-excuses charter school.
By the time I finished my reporting, though, the middle school was starting to find its footing, and the elementary schools, where some of the students had been with the Harlem Children’s Zone since Baby College, were truly thriving. The latest third-grade test scores have been impressive—in 2008, in one charter school, 97 percent of the third-grade class was on grade level in math and in the other 100 percent were. In 2009, 95 percent of one third-grade class and 86 percent of the other was on grade level in English Language Arts. And perhaps more importantly, the elementary schools and the kids in them felt somehow…normal. When I spent time in the classrooms, I got the strong feeling that when these kids got to middle school, they weren’t going to need the kind of heroic interventions that Promise Academy Middle School and most other charter middle schools need to employ today. They wouldn’t need remediation and advanced character-building and constant test prep—they would just be competent, engaged students for the rest of their school careers. And these are kids who, for the most part, came from low-income, often difficult backgrounds, with a fair number of teenage parents and parents who didn’t complete high school.? They were exactly the same kind of kids, in other words, who arrived in the sixth grade in the first year of Promise Academy middle school, the ones who showed up reading three and four years behind grade level, and whose subsequent middle school careers were a constant struggle. This new generation of kids had the good fortune to find a place on the Conveyor Belt, and that meant they faced a very different kind of future than most kids growing up in Harlem.
In the summer of 2007, an unlikely presidential candidate named Barack Obama gave a speech in which he praised Geoffrey Canada and the Harlem Children’s Zone. “When I’m President,” he said, “the first part of my plan to combat urban poverty will be to replicate the Harlem Children’s Zone in twenty cities across the country. We’ll train staff, we’ll have them draw up detailed plans with attainable goals, and the federal government will provide half of the funding for each city, with the rest coming from philanthropies and businesses.”
There aren’t yet airtight data to prove that Canada’s model works. And so rather than simply cloning the Zone and airdropping it into communities around the country, Obama’s replication project will work best if each city is encouraged to adapt and innovate, to compete with every other city for the best results. (As Obama said in his speech announcing the plan, “…every step these cities take will be evaluated, and if certain plans or programs aren’t working, we will stop them and try something else.”)
A graduate of the Baby College Program and his son.
Obama’s “Promise Neighborhoods” could challenge the traditional division between education policy and poverty policy—between improving schools and improving the lives of poor families. Geoffrey Canada’s argument is that it no longer makes sense to think of each one separately. If we try to fix the schools in a low-income neighborhood without addressing the other needs of students there, it’s not a real solution to the neighborhood’s problems. And it isn’t enough to provide social services to poor children if their neighborhood schools are still giving them a lousy education. A true solution to the problem of underachievement in inner-city public schools is going to require more nurturing families and safer neighborhoods as well as better teachers and more accountable schools. That’s the real point of the Harlem Children’s Zone, and, I think, it’s going to be the next chapter in the debate over schools.
Photo Credit: All photographs copyright Alex Tehrani 2008.
Design + the Zone
by Erin Weber
Erin Weber is a student in the Pratt Design Management program. She spends her weekdays directing the marketing initiatives and designing ads for a luxury furniture company based in Manhattan. Erin received her undergraduate degree in Communication Design and Psychology from Carnegie Mellon University.
Recognizing Parents as Assets
Arguably, the two most innovative aspects of the Harlem Children’s Zone (HCZ) conveyor belt strategy are Baby College and Three-year-old-Journey. The purpose of both programs is to empower parents to be assets in the lives of their children. During Baby College expectant mothers and fathers participate and receive training during weekend classes. Similarly, parents of toddlers are taught the importance of language during Three-year-old Journey sessions. The programs instill in parents the essential role they play in the development of their children. Instead of circumventing the influence of parents, the strategy of the HCZ maximizes its resources by capitalizing on the opportunity offered by informed parents.
Communicating Success
Although Geoffrey Canada believes that success will only come when the HCZ kids start graduating from college, there remain many stakeholders such as financial investors and civil leaders from other regions who do not want to wait 21 years to see tangible results. As Tough detailed in his book Whatever it Takes and his posting above, the incremental results the Conveyor Belt model has in the lives of Harlem’s children are quite remarkable: typical 6th graders entering the Promise Academy scored in the 39th percentile among New York City’s math students, but by eighth grade, they were scoring in the 74th percentile.2 Similar results are visually represented to the right.
Although these facts and many more can be found in text format sprinkled throughout blogs, books and web sites, the results of the HCZ programs have yet to find their way into an accessible graphic format. This observation is unfortunate considering the attention the Harlem Children’s Zone students, staff and faculty have earned. Design has the opportunity to play a role in the Harlem Children’s Zone by attracting investors, informing civil decision makers, encouraging teachers and inspiring students and visionaries. As minimally represented here, visual comparative analysis across years of study, academic subjects and, in the future, geographical regions could be designed using graphs, illustrations, and interactive media such as Many Eyes.
“Yes. I’m going to create 20 Harlem Children’s Zones around the country. I am.”
—Secretary of Education, Duncan
A Strategy for Growth
Education is the starting point for a sustainable future. In John Kao’s book Innovation Nation, the author describes how America is losing its creative edge to countries that have a better system for developing creativity and an appreciation for education and intelligence. The new administration in Washington has voiced a renewed interest in education reform across the United States and supports the notion of regaining our innovative edge as a nation.
Even in the face of the economic downturn, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan recently pledged his support of expanding the HCZ strategy to other cities around the country. The implication of communicating the strategies and best practices of the Harlem Children’s Zone to other communities is a complex and daunting task. HCZ already manages the “Practitioners Institute” at their headquarters in Harlem. The Institute is a forum for community groups to attend customized workshops to guide the implementation of HCZ practice in their own hometowns. Because of its popularity, the Practitioners Institute requires admissions applications and has dramatic requirements and high expectations for attendees. Based on the volume of need and the amount of interest in the Harlem Children’s Zone, there is opportunity for the design of strategic implementation tools such as operational guidebooks, workbooks, graphs and structural diagrams.
What does the future hold for the Harlem Children’s Zone? Hopefully while the conveyor belt strategy is proven successful by incremental academic tests, the HCZ curriculum will also expand to include a nurturing of creativity and innovative problem solving. The sustainability of American innovation rests in the hands of our children and their future capacity for imagination and creativity.
Talking with Secretary of Education Duncan
Excerpt from Chicago Magazine, April 2009
By Jennifer Tanaka
TANAKA: Have you read Whatever It Takes, the new book about Geoffrey Canada’s Harlem Children’s Zone? I bring it up because that project, which tries to catch kids from birth and guide them all the way to college, suggests that it may be necessary in certain communities for the neighborhood school to take on functions that lie traditionally in the realm of social services.
DUNCAN: Geoff Canada’s a good, good friend of mine
TANAKA: Obviously you’re familiar with what he’s doing.
DUNCAN: Yes. I’m going to create 20 Harlem Children’s Zones around the country. I am.
TANKA: Really? Do you think you’ll face opposition to the federal role expanding in that way?
DUNCAN: I don’t care. I’m going to fund it.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
About the Author:
Paul Tough is an editor at the New York Times Magazine and the author of Whatever It Takes: Geoffrey Canada’s Quest to Change Harlem and America. His reporting on Geoffrey Canada and the Harlem Children’s Zone originally appeared as a New York Times Magazine cover story. He lives with his wife in New York City.1
Erin Weber is a student in the Pratt Design Management program. She spends her weekdays directing the marketing initiatives and designing ads for a luxury furniture company based in Manhattan. Erin received her undergraduate degree in Communication Design and Psychology from Carnegie Mellon University.
REFERENCES
1. Paul Tough. Whatever it Takes: Geoffrey Canada’s Quest to Change Harlem and America.
Houghton Mifflin Company, New York: 2008.
2. David Brooks. “The Harlem Miracle.” The New York Times, May 8, 2009.
Slate.com blog posts by Paul Tough
RELATED RESOURCES
To learn more or donate to the Harlem Children’s Zone, visit their web site: www.hcz.org
Watch Sir Ken Robinson discuss
“Do schools kill creativity” at the TED conference
Visit the Many Eyes web site to experience interactive, visual representation of data